NEXT IceStorm 1.5.2

Card draw simulator
Odds: 0% – 0% – 0% more
Repartition by Cost
Repartition by Strength
Derived from
None. Self-made deck here.
Inspiration for
NEXT IceStorm 1.5.6
Include in your page (help)

ZiNOS 435

The deck is still undergoing changes but this is the current build, after a lot of changes. The deck is a rush deck that forces early agendas. The main idea is to force the scoring either of a Mandatory Upgrades or an Accelerated Beta Test. It is crucial to lay down an agenda on the remote server you will create from the free ice and then advance it. Most of the times, it is actually good to activate the Accelerated Beta Test ability since the ice density of the deck is pretty heavy. In case you only draw 1 ice in your starting hand, mulligan without second thoughts :)

5 comments
17 Dec 2013 ZiNOS

This is the current version of the deck and frankly, is the best version of the Next i have come up against. The main difference with the previous version is the inclusion of 2 5/3 agendas and some bigger ice. It is very crucial to rush any agenda early (but be careful for the Inside jobs) since all agendas except Project Vitruvious (i do not have another 3/2 to include) will help you in the game. It is a rush deck that forces the runner to take chances and make runs, sometimes only to find a melange or an ash waiting. Caduceus are very nice additions, thnx to the advice of another player.

Cheers!

17 Dec 2013 Chiko-Pops

Nice deck ! I'll try with this : -1 mining corp, -1 restructure, +2 biotic labour. The idea is to one Turn a beta test in order to have a Nice remote server to made mandatories in 2 turns

18 Dec 2013 ZiNOS

Actually your idea is really interesting and i think that i am going to try it too. Makes the scoring of the last Agenda easier! Cheers.

2 Jan 2014 JWHamner

I wonder if you could swap the Ice Walls for Paper Walls to get Beanstalk in instead of GLC?

9 Jan 2014 ZiNOS

This is something that i am testing right now. How can I update the version of the deck here at Netrunnerdb by showing that this deck was the predecessor?